Dear Mayor Burnham,
my niece wrote the following to me yesterday: ‘I know how important this is to you, but sending constant emails may not be the most effective way of getting your message across. People stop reading. We had a guy in Tameside who would send lots of emails to us, local councillors, local government and whilst he had some extremely valid points, they were lost because people got fed up of him emailing all the time. Colleagues would delete before even reading.’
She’s absolutely right and I’ve been aware of this all along but I’m caught in a catch 22. If I don’t write enough, you won’t grasp the reality of the dangers of 5G or of the elements of the ‘closed-system’ that are strategically being used to keep these known dangers hidden. Conversely, if I write what’s required to expose the ‘closed system’, which is what I’ve chosen to do, I risk losing your attention, being considered a nuisance, and having my emails automatically deleted.
I will finish my critique of Dr Grimes’ article in the next email. There are a couple of things I want to cover first.
The screens through which the vast majority of people are acquiring information on 5G honour both definitions of the word ‘screen’. Screens selectively put out streams of chosen images and information … but screens can also be used to screen out and hide things. They can screen out images and information and thus omit them from the narrative so that they remain hidden. This is a highly effective way to control information, especially in a society gaining most of its information from screens. Such an orchestrated use of screened out ‘omissions’ serves as one of the greatest threats to us all. It’s clever. Via the media, the 5G territory in people’s minds has been rotavated, tilled, fertilized and seeded with 5G seeds that promise the prettiest flowers ever beheld by human eyes… but what is not being sown in people’s minds, what remains well hidden behind screens, is the reality that the 5G plant, bearing such pretty flowers, is, in truth, the technological equivalent of poison hemlock. Unthinkable as this may sound, it’s true. The tactic of ‘the unthinkable’ is a very dangerous tactic… and a remarkably effective one. Human brains are open to, and thus vulnerable to, influence and, one way or another, they are being collectively influenced by the cell phone industry, the governments who are supposed to take care of people, and the media who are supposed to honestly inform us. We are all being lied to.
A couple of days ago I came across a heart rending and shocking video of a father addressing the Royal Society of Canada about Wi-Fi.
From the BBC website:
‘What are the concerns over wi-fi safety?
Some scientists have reported that low levels of non-ionising radiation can cause damage to chromosomes. But there is currently no scientific evidence that wi-fi, in particular, causes this to happen.
There is speculation that low level radiation can do more than just excite atoms, a non-thermal interaction., but again there is no current evidence to suggest this is possible.’
You’ve got the BBC’s reassurance … now see if tallies with this video. If you’re short of time, then please, at least, try to watch the first four minutes: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bsPBUuwCfaI
If you can’t spare 4 minutes, then here are the basics: Since Wi-Fi was installed in Simcoe County schools, 2 children died from their hearts just stopping beating through cardiac arrest, 2 now have pacemakers fitted due to going into cardiac arrest, 4 children were experiencing erratic tachycardia, one’s heartbeat jumping from 68 beats a minute to 200 beats a minute, and were wearing heart monitors to school. In one school, approximately half the mothers, when asked about the health of their children, said that for 18 months they’d been in and out of doctors’ surgeries with a range of neurological symptoms. This was in the 18 months since the schools installed Wi-Fi. The symptoms disappeared at weekends and in the holidays. Nothing was done to reduce levels or remove the Wi-Fi out of the schools, instead, every school was fitted with a defibrillator.
Something from the UK, here’s a Telegraph article from 2015 ‘Is Wi-fi making your child ill?’ by Dr Erica Mallery-Blythe: https://www.telegraph.co.uk/health-fitness/body/wifi-internet-family-dangerous-health/ and more importantly, here’s a fifteen minute video of her talking about the validated harmful effects of Wi-Fi and mobile phones which, for the sake of your own and your family’s health, I strongly advise you to watch. I might just call it my ”I rest my case” video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WyPsXpkzTOM
Dr Erica Mallery-Blythe, ”The precautionary principle is outdated now, it’s overdue and protection is an emergency.” (Not that even the precautionary principle is being applied)
”Some people are left in disbelief really, and think that this can’t be true. If it was true, then somebody would be telling us. We don’t need to look back very far to see that the public were not warned in a timely fashion before.”
”It’s time to stop denying it and to take this threat very seriously.”
All of this spoken three years prior to 5G and planetary satellite Wi-Fi saturation.
There is a huge body of scientists warning about the dangers of Radio Frequency radiation. It is a large scientific consensus. What’s going on? Why aren’t we being told? It’s because information is cleverly controlled by people with little or no conscience and also because a small percentage of scientists are willing to sell their scientific souls to be complicit in covering up the dangers. Dr Erica Mallery-Blythe ends her talk with these words, ”There comes a time when one must take a position that is neither safe, nor politic, nor popular, but he must take it because conscience tells him it is right.” Martin Luther King. We can’t depend on the consciences of those who are lying to us and withholding crucial information. This is why I’m writing to you… and to councillors and to people who are not ”just following orders” because it’s becoming clearer and clearer that all too many of those who are giving out the orders can’t be trusted.
The saturation of this planet in frequencies that are now known by thousands of scientists to be harmful is utterly shocking… but this is only of concern to the individuals who are responsible for implementing the technology if the truth, which could hinder their unregulated plans, comes out.
I would like to know what the planning situation is on the ubiquitous placing of the antennas. Do local councils have control?
My kindest regards,