Margaret’s response can be found under ‘5G Emails to Parliament’ then in the ‘Responses so far from Members of Parliament’ page.
Dear Dame Margaret Hodge,
thank you for taking the trouble to reply to my letter, which outlines the serious risks 5G poses.
Perhaps you didn’t read the section in my letter, ‘THE NORTH, SOUTH, EAST AND WEST OF 5G PROPAGANDA ‘ which began with the Garry Kasparovote quote: ‘The point of modern propaganda isn’t only to misinform or push an agenda. It is to exhaust your critical thinking, to annihilate truth’. The link you sent took me to a video that ticked every box for top class propaganda which typically waffles a bit about background radiation, skims the truth, then glides, via chosen experts, in the opposite, deceptive, industry friendly, direction in order to strategically dispel the truth. it’s despicable on more than one level.
Seeking the truth about mobile phone radiation health effects is a tortuous process that leads down many rabbit holes into a maze of warrens. The reason I deemed it necessary to cover the subject of 5G propaganda in my letter was because I knew people might do a google search and think they’d found answers. The dependable truth lies with the scientific experts who are qualified in the field and do not have vested interests. These are the scientists who are appealing to the world health authorities. These are the scientists who have researched the science with an open mind, who haven’t fallen prey to ‘man prefers to believe what man prefers to be true’ but have let the science inform them… and, perhaps most importantly, who are not either directly or indirectly in the pocket of the industry, which can be hugely corrupting.
Is parliament simply going to ignore the three international scientists’ appeals? 1. The ‘EMF Appeal’ (mentioned in my letter) which, in 2015, was sent to the UN and WHO, requesting a lowering of current EMF guidelines and standards because they are not protective. The 206 signatories of the appeal were scientists who each had published, peer reviewed scientific papers (over two thousand papers collectively) on the biological effects of EMFs. This was not just a group of random scientists, the list was scientifically specific and illustrious: https://www.emfscientist.org/index.php/emf-scientist-appeal. 2. The subsequent ‘5G Appeal’which went out in 2017, this time addressed to the EU, warning of ‘potential serious health effects of 5G‘ and advising a moratorium. 3. A third attempt in 2018 that was again created to try to protect the world’s population, this time named ‘The EMF Call’. It warned that ICNIRP international guidelines on RF radiation (mobile phone radiation) are not protective and endanger people. (These are the guidelines the British Parliament is referencing to justify the roll-out of 5G.)
So, in spite of these three international appeals from some of the world’s most qualified scientists in the field of the harmful biological effects of EMFs, including mobile phone radiation, 5G is being rolled out within yards of homes, schools, hospitals and workplaces, without a single safety test and in blatant denial of the potential harm it will almost certainly inflict on the population. A loose analogy would be to say that it’s like going from 10 cigarettes a day (4G) to 100 cigarettes a day (5G). The 10 cigarettes will inevitably cause cumulative damage (and according to genetic predisposition, affect people differently). The 100 cigarettes will exponentially increase the risk and the degree of damage. The big difference, of course, is that with smoking there’s an element of choice. Being permanently subjected to phased array (that’s another subject) 5G frequencies will be mandatory.
The 18 page letter I wrote can be boiled down to the following: 1.5G is totally untested for safety. 2. Over 200 highly qualified scientists have warned the EU of ‘Potential serious health effects of 5G’ and recommended calling for a moratorium. 3. The Internet of Things, including driverless cars, will be vulnerable to hacking and there is no way to fully protect it. 4. Artificial intelligence is going to not only rob people of their jobs but will pose an existential threat that could wipe out the human race. (Amongst those warning of this potential existential threat was the late Prof, Stephen Hawkins.) If the media reported this to the British people, do you think they’d want 5G? Absolutely not. The risks 5G poses, as I said in the letter, astronomically outweigh the benefits. If the government allows the roll-out to continue without safety testing it will, indisputably, be risking inflicting serious harm on the British population which is, by definition, an unlawful act.
Here’s something from Brussels: https://www.brusselstimes.com/all-news/brussels-all-news/55052/radiation-concerns-halt-brussels-5g-for-now/ “I cannot welcome such technology if the radiation standards, which must protect the citizen, are not respected, 5G or not,” Environment minister Céline Fremault (CDH) told Bruzz. “The people of Brussels are not guinea pigs whose health I can sell at a profit. We cannot leave anything to doubt,”
This is a short video which is not propaganda. It’s of Dr Martin Pall, one of the world’s leading scientific experts on the biological effects of EMFs:https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=78&v=kBsUWbUB6PE
This is the link to Dr Martin Pall’s document ‘5G: Great risk for EU, U.S. and International Health! Compelling Evidence for Eight Distinct Types of Great Harm Caused by Electromagnetic Field (EMF) Exposures and the Mechanism that Causes Them’
It’s time to stop paying attention to the propaganda, or to the blind conjecture that all too many uninformed people are spouting, and to pay attention to what many of the world’s most qualified scientists are desperately trying to warn us of i.e. that 5G technology comes with ‘potential serious health effects’.
Thank you again for taking the time to respond.
With kind regards,