Email to Stockport Council 12/08/19

To: cllr.elise.wilson@stockport.gov.uk

Dear ….,

I am writing to you about the extremely serious risks which accompany the deployment of 5G. These risks are being meticulously concealed from the public. It is vitally important that Stockport Council is informed by the facts about 5G, not by the all-pervading propaganda which currently heralds its arrival.

There are three pivotal issues relating to 5G health effects:

1. NOT A SINGLE SAFETY TEST has been carried out on the health effects of 5G frequencies.

2. 244 highly qualified scientists have appealed to the EU for a halt to the 5G roll-out and warned of ‘potential serious health effects’. Their warnings are being ignored.

3. The Government’s advisory body, Public Health England, is referencing the ICNIRP (International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection) guidelines to claim that 5G poses no threat to public health. ICNIRP, a self-appointed group made up of thirteen members, has been vehemently discredited by a large body of international scientists. The scientists are warning that the ICNIRP guidelines are neither scientific nor adequately protective and therefore pose a serious threat to all lifeforms, including humans.

Here is a link to the 18 page letter which outlines the potential dangers of 5G. It was sent to all 650 MPs and the Queen earlier this year: https://parentsandconcernedcitizensagainst5g.files.wordpress.com/2019/05/5g-letter-to-mps-18-pages-may-2019.pdf (The section on propaganda is extremely important). My letter states:  ‘If the British Government cannot provide independent, peer reviewed, indubitable, scientific evidence that 5G frequencies cause no biological risk to the British people, especially considering the independent scientists’ warnings and recommendation to the EU, the deployment of 5G must not go ahead. If the government sanctions the deployment of 5G without this evidence and in denial of the warnings of ‘potential serious health effects’, it will, unarguably, be perpetrating a heinous and reckless crime against the British Population.’ This is indisputable.

Glastonbury Council has stated that it opposes the implementation of 5G until safety testing has been carried out (https://glastonbury.gov.uk/2019/06/19/town-council-challenges-5g/): Glastonbury Town Council website: ‘At the Glastonbury Town Council meeting on Tuesday 11th June a motion proposed by Cllr Mike Smyth and seconded by Cllr Jon Cousins read as follows: This council has a social responsibility to protect the public and environment from exposure to harm, albeit unpredictable in the current state of scientific knowledge, and therefore opposes the roll-out of 5G in the Parish of Glastonbury – based on the precautionary principle – until further information is revealed from a newly convened 5G advisory committee‘ …  ‘Cllr Smyth concluded “This council has a duty of care to the people of Glastonbury and our environment, and we should protect them from potentially harmful situations.” ‘

Brussels has halted the 5G pilot project (https://www.brusselstimes.com/brussels/55052/radiation-concerns-halt-brussels-5g-for-now/): ‘Plans for a pilot project to provide high-speed 5G wireless internet in Brussels have been halted due to fears for the health of citizens … “I cannot welcome such technology if the radiation standards, which must protect the citizen, are not respected, 5G or not,” Environment minister Céline Fremault (CDH) told Bruzz. “The people of Brussels are not guinea pigs whose health I can sell at a profit. We cannot leave anything to doubt,”she added.

My local MP, William Wragg, MP for Hazel Grove, recently wrote of his concerns and his stance in letters to the then Minister of State for Health, Rt Hon Matt Hancock and the then Minister of State for Digital, Media, Culture and Sport, Rt Hon Jeremy Wright: ‘I therefore ask that you provide independent, peer reviewed, indubitable and definitive evidence that the technology is safe and poses no risk to human health. This evidence must look at both the effect of short term and long term cumulative effects on people, the impacts of living close to antennae sites and the general background level that a national network will bring. If such evidence does not exist that the Government commission research into it as a matter of urgency. 5G technology should not be rolled out until we can be sure that it is safe, and in the absence of such evidence I would not support its further development, until the health effects have been fully established.’

5G antennae are to be ubiquitously deployed within yards of homes, schools and work places. There will be no safe distance.

My daughter has created a blog: ‘Parents and Concerned Citizens Against 5G’. Here’s a link to the video page: https://parentsandconcernedcitizensagainst5g.com/videos/.

Throughout the coming week I’ll forward some of the emails I’ve recently sent to particular Members of Parliament, which contain relevant and important information.

 

Sincerely,

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this:
search previous next tag category expand menu location phone mail time cart zoom edit close