5G technology fundamentally violates our human rights. Informed as I’ve become, I view the 5G roll-out as an aberrative and criminal act. I wrote in my letter to the MPs, ‘it is glaringly obvious, under even the slightest scrutiny, that the risks posed by this 5G future astronomically outweigh the benefits.’
Claire Edwards, international 5G Space Appeal: ”5G is not only mad, it is completely off the scale mad, and as soon as you start talking about 5G in rational terms, you are normalizing it. There is nothing normal about 5G.”
A certain vernacular is required when writing to official bodies about the risks of 5G. However, I completely agree with Claire Edwards… and I would add that rolling out 5G is not only ”off the scale mad”, it is an off the scale crime against humanity and all of life.
Below is my email titled ‘Human rights’.
|To:||WRAGG, William <firstname.lastname@example.org>, email@example.com, Jeremy.firstname.lastname@example.org, email@example.com,firstname.lastname@example.org|
At the Science and Technology Committee meeting on 10th June, Norman Lamb asked Steve Sampson, Head of Technology for UK and Ireland at Nokia, ”Should we do business with a company that’s complicit in human rights abuses?” The irony of his question was lost on the committee: Dr Martin Pall, ” It is my opinion that 5G will be vastly more dangerous than the things which preceded it. … you do not put out EMFs without doing safety testing. It is an atrocity to do that.”
Why does Dr Pall describe the deployment of 5G EMFs without safety testing as“an atrocity”? In a letter fo California Governor Jerry Brown, he wrote: ‘The industry keeps touting that their devices are within the safety guidelines set by the FCC? We know how the EMFs work in the body and that the industry propaganda has no science behind it. But what can we say about the 5G EMFs and what effects it will have on our bodies? 5G will be much more active in activating the VGCCs (voltage-gated calcium channels) and producing health impacts because of its rapid absorption by materials in the body, because of its very rapid pulsations and because of the huge number antennae they are planning to put up, at least 200 times the number of antennae from all current cell phone towers. What this means is that the impacts on the outer one to two inches of our bodies will be massive. Because of this we can expect humans to suffer from:
1. Very large increases in blindness from each of the four major causes of blindness: cataracts, macular degeneration, glaucoma and retinal detachment. Each of these involves excessive calcium levels in different parts of the eye and 3 of them also involve excessive voltage-gated calcium activity. I conclude that each of them is likely to be massively elevated by 5G.
2. Large increases in hearing loss and tinnitus, leading in many cases to deafness.
3. Very large increases in male infertility, as well as universal drops in sperm count.
4. Very substantial numbers of melanoma skin cancer and leukemia and possibly other types of cancer. EMFs appear to be particularly active in causing cancer in children and consequently children are at special risk from 5G.
5. Impacts on the peripheral nervous system leading to near universal neuropathic pain and peripheral neuropathy.
6. Large increases in thyroid dysfunction, because of the location of the thyroid gland near the surface of the body.
7. Impacts on the immune system cells, possibly leading to autoimmune diseases and other deficiencies.
8. Impacts on the erythrocytes (red blood cells), leading to stacking of the erythrocytes into rouleaux (long chains) and also cell lysis, leading to very low oxygen in the tissues and lowered nutrients transport to the tissues.
Because plants and animals are affected as much as we are, but much larger parts of them are highly exposed to the 5G radiation, the impacts on insects (including bees and other pollinators), birds, small mammals and almost all plants will be much more severe than the effects of humans.’
The letter and emails that I, as a British citizen, have sent to members of the British Parliament have provided factual and verifiable information on the serious threat 5G poses to the safety, wellbeing and basic human rights of the British population. Officialdom, either by design or through inadvertence, has failed in its duty to provide this information, however, whether it’s being presented via an official or an unofficial source, the information itself upholds in its own right. The three most glaring issues are the complete absence of safety testing on 5G frequency biological effects, the scientists’ appeals warning about the ‘potential serious health effects of 5G’ and the inadequacy of the ‘unscientific’ ICNIRP guidelines (referenced by PHE) to protect the public from the harmful effects of non-ionizing radiation at non-thermal levels.
I first contacted you about 5G at the end of January 2018. Since then I have dedicated myself to a relentless pursuit of factual information on 5G technology. This is my assessment: Exposing people to 5G RF radiation is an insidious form of physical assault which will threaten the health and safety of the British public and violate their basic human rights. By its very nature, this technology has the capability to cause serious harm, especially cumulatively… and particularly to children.
Please will you forward this email to your researcher. Also, please can you reply to my question in the previous email.
I’ll be forwarding this to the Science and Technology Committee members, the Health and Social Care Committee members and also to Dr Julian Lewis.
I’ll be contacting you further on some specifics.