|To:||WRAGG, William <email@example.com>|
|CC:||firstname.lastname@example.org, email@example.com, firstname.lastname@example.org, email@example.com, firstname.lastname@example.org|
as I wrote in my letter to the MPs, the physical safety of millions of British men, women and children, not to mention animals, birds, insects, trees and plants, rests on exposing, and acting on, the truth within the dichotomy between the government’s scientific stance claiming no harm and the perspective of the large body of scientists warning of the risk of serious harm.
The EMF Scientist Appeal (2015) 2019 Press Release
‘urgently calling upon the United Nations and its sub-organizations, the WHO and UNEP, and all U.N. Member States, for greater health protection on EMF exposure’
U.N. Environment Programme Urged to Protect Nature and Humankind from Electromagnetic Fields (EMF)
4G/5G antenna densification is escalating health risks – a global crisis
The Advisors to the International EMF Scientist Appeal, representing 248 scientists from 42 nations, (almost half of whom are professors) have resubmitted The Appeal to the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) Executive Director, Inger Andersen, requesting the UNEP reassess the potential biological impacts of next generation 4G and 5G telecommunication technologies to plants, animals and humans.
There is particular urgency at this time as new antennas will be densely located throughout residential neighborhoods using much higher frequencies, with greater biologically disruptive pulsations, more dangerous signaling characteristics …
… to seriously address the rapidly escalating health and environmental crisis caused by man-made EMF pollution. Leadership is needed now, especially in light of urgent warnings from international scientists about 4G/5G antenna densification, the Internet of Things (IoT), and plans for significant radiation from space emitted by tens of thousands of satellites now being launched.
Links: Press Release: https://www.emfscientist.org/EMF_Scientist_Press_Release_22_July_2019.pdf
‘The EMF Appeal: https://www.emfscientist.org/index.php/emf-scientist-appeal n.b. ‘The Appeal is being signed by scientists who have published peer-reviewed papers on the biological or health effects of non-ionizing electromagnetic fields … Scientists who have published peer- reviewed papers in related fields and have been significantly engaged in EMF education, are recognized as Supporting Scientists.’
Please bear in mind the content of my emails, ‘ICNIRP’ and ‘The ‘P’ in ICNIRP’, when you read the following:
Public Health England
‘Exposures of radio waves to the public are well within the international health related guideline levels that are used in the UK. These guidelines are from the ICNIRP and underpin health protection policies at UK and European levels.’
‘the highest frequencies being discussed for future use by 5G are around ten times higher than those used by current network technologies, up to a few tens of gigahertz (GHz). … ICNIRP guidelines apply up to 300 GHz, well beyond the maximum frequencies under discussion for 5G.’
‘It is possible that there may be a small increase in overall exposure to radio waves when 5G is added to an existing telecommunications network or in a new area. However, the overall exposure is expected to remain low relative to guidelines and there should be no consequences for public health.’
No mention of the phased array aspect of 5G antennas.
I’ll round things up in the next couple of emails.
This will be forwarded, in line with the two previous emails, to the members of the Science and Technology Committee and the members of the Health and Social Care Committee.
Thanks for your time.